So we have this new thing at work: Bedside triage. Previously, when a patient came in by ambulance, they stopped at a station at the entrance to be evaluated by the ambulance triage nurse. S/he would get the history from the patient and EMS personnel, and then decide where to send the patient: a cardiac bed with a monitor, the asthma chairs, or a non-monitored bed.
Ambulance triage was stocked with a monitor, computer, ID bands, first-aid supplies, and was next to the trauma/resus room in case the patient was really sick. There was plenty of room to move around the patient and if the patient was vomiting, or bleeding, or aggressive, there was room to get out of the way. There was privacy: the patient could tell the nurse about their private medical problems without the person in the next curtain hearing them.
Now, the patient is rolled in, registered, and the charge nurse sends the patient to the bed to be triaged there, either by the nurse in the area or by the "roving ambulance triage" nurse. EMS personnel is dismissed the minute the patient's butt hits the stretcher.
Does anyone see the problems here?
Formerly, the ambulance triage nurse had everything in one place. Now she has to run around the ED dragging her equipment and supplies with her, hoping to find a free computer with which to enter the information. While she's at the bedside, other ambulances are coming in and being sent to beds; the ambulance triage nurse can't stop what she's doing to ask what's up with the other patients in case one of them is sicker than the one she's triaging at the moment.
When EMS is dismissed immediately upon placing the patient in a stretcher, the triage nurse loses a valuable source of information about the patient in the event that the person is nonverbal, or speaks another language, or has some kind of altered mental status. The nurse is forced to rely on the nursing home paperwork, or the EMS written report, which can be sadly deficient.
Here's an example of what happened the other night when I was zooming around like an idiot doing this bedside triage that illustrates the two above statements:
I was at the bedside of a non-English-speaking patient. His family was there, but they didn't speak much English either. The complaint EMS gave the registrar was "vomiting for one hour." The patient was retching uncontrollably in the stretcher and looked much more sick than I expected. No one could give me any information about him, and as I approached him, he belched and I smelled a strange smell: pine-scented cleaner. The front of his shirt was soaked with it. I asked the family, "Why does he smell like this?" "Because he drank some floor cleaner," was the response I got.
Great.
Meanwhile, another patient had been put in another bed and I headed over there, dragging all of my equipment. The complaint was "cough, previous history of pneumonia." While I was spending time figuring out what was wrong with the man who had drank the floor cleaner, this woman was in a bed--with florid pulmonary edema, complete with pink frothy sputum, an 02 sat of 67% on a nonrebreather mask, and a pulse of 144. If I had seen her, I would have yelled for help and sent her to the resus room to be intubated. Instead, EMS put her into a bed, pulled the curtain, and left. Her companion was clueless about what was going on, and was calmly sitting by the bedside reading a magazine. The nurse in the area was completely overwhelmed with his 8 other patients and hadn't gotten a chance to even stick his head into the curtain to see what was up--he was waiting for the triage nurse (me) to tell him what was up.
Asking the nurse in the area to triage her own patients is asking for trouble. We have 52 beds in the adult ED, and we have SIX nurses assigned for patient care. Actually, about half the time we only have five nurses assigned for patient care, now that I think about it. Also, most of those areas can be doubled up when it gets crazy. I've been in a high-acuity area with TWELVE patients--ICU, telemetry, you name it. When would the RN in the area be able to leave her patients to triage another one? In addition, the new protocol calls for the nurse in the area to do her own EKGs. We have an EKG tech--why do we have to do them ourselves?
Management loves bedside triage. It makes our statistics look great: people get into beds immediately, EMS turnaround times are super fast. The director of the ED said, when a nurse pointed out that it was going to be tough for her to do her own EKGs, "So you used to have three things to do. Now you have four. Work faster. So what."
According to one of the managers, the powers-that-be based our new bedside triage protocol on two studies that showed it improved patient outcomes. One of the studies was done in California, where no nurse has more than four patients BY LAW, and the other? Done in a 30-bed ED where there were 15 nurses on staff at all times. Give me two patients and not only will I triage them, do their EKGs, scrub their butts, and care for them, I'll freaking teach them to speak French and give them a mani/pedi to boot.
In our ED, this new bedside triage is unsafe and unfair to the nurses. And it will go on and on, until someone gets overlooked and dies. And then a nurse will lose her job and maybe her license, and THEN we'll go back to regular ambulance triage.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



15 comments:
Make sure to tell the patients/family members to fill out the Press-Ganey survey and write about the poor treatment from bedside triage. If the public complains the hospital usually listens!!
...sounds like bad, unsafe practice. Our triage nurse has always been and stayed in her triage box out the front of ED. She triaged the walkin's and ambo patients, of course the ambo patients get first priority.
I say 'has always been'. May well have changed since the 4 hour rule: where every patient must be seen, and either admitted, transferred, or discharged within 4hours.
Wow, it sounds like your ED is very unsafe for nurses. We don't have a state ratio where I live, but in my ED we never have more than 5 patients. We do immediate bedding in the mornings before the census picks up and we're always told when somebody is put in our room. We don't have an ambulance triage, patients are eyeballed by a charge nurse and placed. The EMS in my states standard of care is to give a verbal hand off or they can't leave. I don't think I'd work under those conditions, it sounds horrible.
Oh MY. I can't imagine how the Mgmt can say it is safe. Maybe they could come down and try and do it. If they CAN - well, then...
As far as the director goes...sounds a lot like the one we had who said "The nurses should get up off their asses and work for a change" when they were piling the patients up in the hallways.....
Unsupportive which leads to low morale. I think I would quit. You work so hard for your license, you wouldn't want to jeopardize it....
Has anyone spoken to risk management about how unsafe this all is? Are there incident reports being written up about specific instances? The pulmonary edema is a good one to send to risk management.
Write up incident reports to risk management. CC a copy of each write up to the CEO and CNO. Keep a copy of each write up for your own personal copy, so none are "lost". This is ridiculous!! The old way you spoke of for triage seemed to be a much safer, more effective method of triaging the patients!
wow, what a sad state of mgmt that is. and unacceptable.
talk about not talking care of your 'soldiers', wtf?!
I would agree with the documentation calls - I know it is extra work when you already have too much on your plate, but if *everyone* starts jumping up and down, then maybe someone will listen before someone dies as a result of management idiocy. And, if they don't listen, an anonymous tip-off to your local paper? Get a journalist to come down to the ED for a day?
That's not triage. I don't know what it is, but it's definitely not triage. It's totally random, sort of like the lottery. Only in this case the losers die.
I can't believe that any risk manager would sign off on this.
Yep you're screwed.
I hope enough people complain so that things can be changed (or that the people who put it in place realise their grave error..wait...does that ever happen?)
OH GOD. That is all.
Yet another situation where management is happy, and patients are happy, and the nurses are UNhappy and nobody listens until someone dies.
Then who gets blamed...? :/
I wish management would work at least a shift or two just to see how idiotic their "great ideas" really are.
I don't know hospital structures, but I'd definitely write it up for in-house legal. If risk mgt is in in-house legal my apologies for being redundant. Someone is going to die with this setup, and that's as serious as a nurse getting fired.
Sounds dreadful! Having worked in an ED and ICU in the US during the 90s, I have fond memories of how well triage used to work...and often wished that the UK would adopt a similar model...your staffing levels sound as crap as UK ones (something that also suprises me as this was not the case where I worked). Has the US system deteriorated this much? I was in a County hospital by the way.
Ambluance Triage souns fabulous. At our ED we only have the direct bedding for ambulancec patients, so it's up to you to get your booty to the bedside asap to see what they look like. Thankfully our charge nurse does SOME triaging for you in terms of, if they're crumping they tell you, if it's total BS they go straight to the front triage and don't get a bed. Other than that it's on you. The other thankful part is we have good medics who like our ED the best out of the three they can go to, and so they'll be upfront with you and you'll KNOW if you need to be in there right away, and usually they'll say it in their radio report.
It sucks though. Oh, and we have ZERO techs and no lab so we do everything, BUT I'm one of those lucky ones who's ratio is 4:1!
Post a Comment